Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (2.99 vs 1.25, Δ 1.74).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 445Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 504Lead | Total passes | 302 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.85 | Goals prevented | 0.85 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |