Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- FC Cincinnati held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 281 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |