Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.97, Δ 0.83).
- FC Dallas held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 4 |
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 355 | Accurate passes | 406Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |