Match statistics snapshot
- FC Dallas created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 1.99, Δ 0.11).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- FC Dallas was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.59 | Goals prevented | -1.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Fc Dallas |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |