Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (2.72 vs 2.61, Δ 0.11).
- Houston Dynamo fired more attempts (20 vs 16 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.61 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 357 |
| 447Lead | Total passes | 421 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -2.60 | Goals prevented | -2.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.