Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 0.70, Δ 0.57).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 423Lead | Accurate passes | 293 |
| 492Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.33 | Goals prevented | 0.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Minnesota United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.