Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.50, Δ 0.93).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 364 |
| 471Lead | Total passes | 450 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.