Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 1.59, Δ 0.32).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 447Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 529Lead | Total passes | 353 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.45 | Goals prevented | 0.45 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |