Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 0.63, Δ 0.29).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 245 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 336 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |