Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 1.10, Δ 0.73).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (25 vs 12 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 11Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 25Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 408Lead | Accurate passes | 333 |
| 460Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 0.12 | Goals prevented | 0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |