Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.85 vs 0.07, Δ 1.78).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (14 vs 1 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.85Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 383 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 439 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Atlanta United Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |