Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.55 vs 0.56, Δ 1.99).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (21 vs 6 shots).
- CF Montreal was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 587Lead | Accurate passes | 316 |
| 651Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.