Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 0.49, Δ 1.07).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.49 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 468Lead | Accurate passes | 353 |
| 558Lead | Total passes | 434 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.98 | Goals prevented | -0.98 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Cf Montreal |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.