Match statistics snapshot
- Charlotte created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 2.11, Δ 0.28).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (21 vs 12 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.11Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 614Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 677Lead | Total passes | 309 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.68 | Goals prevented | 0.68 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Fouls | 4 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.