Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.57 vs 1.77, Δ 0.80).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 2.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.77 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 580Lead | Accurate passes | 403 |
| 638Lead | Total passes | 460 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.30 | Goals prevented | -0.30 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.