Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (20 vs 15 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 412Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 497Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.