Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 0.38, Δ 1.88).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 609Lead | Accurate passes | 271 |
| 663Lead | Total passes | 329 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |
Statistics is not available yet.