Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 1.72, Δ 0.39).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 499Lead | Accurate passes | 325 |
| 557Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.