Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.15 vs 1.08, Δ 0.07).
- DC United fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 335 | Accurate passes | 369Lead |
| 414 | Total passes | 451Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.