Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.45 vs 0.45, Δ 2.00).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 2.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 529Lead | Accurate passes | 283 |
| 589Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.28 | Goals prevented | -0.28 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Dc United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |