Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (0.63 vs 0.32, Δ 0.31).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 526Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 597Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.92 | Goals prevented | 0.92 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Houston Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.