Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (19 vs 12 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 360 |
| 548Lead | Total passes | 459 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |