Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.82 vs 1.09, Δ 0.73).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (9 vs 6 shots).
- Inter Miami held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.82Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 397 | Accurate passes | 442Lead |
| 454 | Total passes | 518Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.10 | Goals prevented | 0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |