Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (2.94 vs 0.86, Δ 2.08).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 587Lead | Accurate passes | 393 |
| 649Lead | Total passes | 464 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.91 | Goals prevented | 0.91 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.