Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.73 vs 0.46, Δ 1.27).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 366 |
| 483Lead | Total passes | 435 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.