Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 2.77, Δ 0.51).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (21 vs 14 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 24%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.77Lead |
| 4Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 612Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 688Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.99 | Goals prevented | -0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |