Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.81, Δ 0.56).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.81Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box |
| 12Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 506Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 582Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.21 | Goals prevented | 0.21 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |