Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (0.44 vs 1.35, Δ 0.91).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (52% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 0.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 466Lead | Accurate passes | 406 |
| 539Lead | Total passes | 460 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.81 | Goals prevented | -0.81 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New England Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |