Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.55 vs 1.74, Δ 1.19).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- New York City FC was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 522Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 7 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |