Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (3.04 vs 1.20, Δ 1.84).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 11 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 364 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 442 | Total passes | 515Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -1.59 | Goals prevented | -1.59 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |