Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 0.61, Δ 0.57).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (20 vs 5 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 596Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 661Lead | Total passes | 358 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 0.51 | Goals prevented | 0.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.