Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.59, Δ 0.88).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (24 vs 7 shots).
- Portland Timbers was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 562Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 640Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.