Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (1.88 vs 2.24, Δ 0.36).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 20%).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.24Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 473Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 339 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.16 | Goals prevented | -1.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | San Jose Earthquakes |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.