Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Columbus Crew held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 370 |
| 496Lead | Total passes | 439 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.