Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 31%).
- Toronto FC held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 335 | Accurate passes | 444Lead |
| 418 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |