Match statistics snapshot
- Columbus Crew created the clearer chances on xG (1.90 vs 0.41, Δ 1.49).
- Columbus Crew fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Columbus Crew was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.41 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 436Lead | Accurate passes | 293 |
| 488Lead | Total passes | 344 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.39 | Goals prevented | -1.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Columbus Crew | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |