Match statistics snapshot
- AC Milan created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 1.30, Δ 0.03).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 322Lead | Accurate passes | 308 |
| 389Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.56 | Goals prevented | -0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |