Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.28, Δ 0.59).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- AC Milan was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 94%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 617Lead | Accurate passes | 254 |
| 659Lead | Total passes | 320 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.88 | Goals prevented | 1.88 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Ac Milan |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |