Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.34, Δ 0.89).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.34 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 259 | Accurate passes | 448Lead |
| 332 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.