Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.86 vs 0.86, Δ 1.00).
- Como fired more attempts (22 vs 3 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 477Lead | Accurate passes | 202 |
| 549Lead | Total passes | 276 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.34 | Goals prevented | -0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | As Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.