Match statistics snapshot
- Bologna created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 1.20, Δ 0.03).
- Bologna held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Bologna |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Bologna |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 375 | Total passes | 470Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Bologna |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Bologna |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.05 | Goals prevented | -1.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Bologna |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |