Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (2.02 vs 0.81, Δ 1.21).
- Como fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 2.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 560Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.25 | Goals prevented | -1.25 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |