Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.64, Δ 0.42).
- Como fired more attempts (10 vs 4 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.64 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 75%Lead | Ball possession | 25% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 554Lead | Accurate passes | 141 |
| 635Lead | Total passes | 219 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.37 | Goals prevented | 1.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Cagliari |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |