Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Catanzaro was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 13%).
- Catanzaro held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 201 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 297 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |