Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.30 vs 0.45, Δ 0.85).
- Como fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 1.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 377Lead | Accurate passes | 241 |
| 451Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.31 | Goals prevented | 0.31 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Cremonese |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |