Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.94 vs 1.68, Δ 0.26).
- Como fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Como held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Empoli |
|---|---|---|
| 1.94Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.68 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Empoli |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 501Lead | Accurate passes | 148 |
| 581Lead | Total passes | 227 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Empoli |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Empoli |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.93 | Goals prevented | 0.93 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Empoli |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |