Match statistics snapshot
- Como fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- Como held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 483Lead | Accurate passes | 280 |
| 561Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Feralpisalo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |