Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.96, Δ 0.18).
- Como fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Fiorentina was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Fiorentina |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Fiorentina |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 433Lead | Accurate passes | 312 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 382 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Fiorentina |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Fiorentina |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.01 | Goals prevented | 1.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Fiorentina |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |