Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 1.39, Δ 0.14).
- Como fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 22%).
Como vs Inter
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.39Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 18Lead | Total shots | 11 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 383 | Accurate passes | 614Lead |
| 435 | Total passes | 677Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.76 | Goals prevented | 0.76 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |