Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (3.12 vs 0.88, Δ 2.24).
- Como fired more attempts (24 vs 7 shots).
- Inter was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 485Lead | Total passes | 325 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -0.49 | Goals prevented | -0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Como | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 7 |